|
This is the modern view of the Yesterday's Tractors Forums. Just login with your YT Userid and password to post. If you have trouble logging in, contact us by email to support at ytmag.com, or through the Reader Form, and we will get you going right away.
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Kevin B from Illinois Regular
Joined: 03 Sep 2011 Posts: 416
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:55 pm Post subject: Tractor Comparison's |
|
|
OK I am a Red man so be nice but it is fun to shut the bull, D19 vs Farmall 560, vs case 730 vs jd 730 vs oliver 1650 rank them for fun do both gas and diesel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BushogPapa Tractor Guru
Joined: 26 Dec 2001 Posts: 5178
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:27 am Post subject: Re: Tractor Comparison's |
|
|
I believe there are different types of people with different Personalities that are attracted to one or two brands...
The IH owner would rather just drive and not be bothered by the monotonous sound of his 4 cylinder engine, etc..and enjoys listening to his radio, I suppose..
The JD owner is more of a "Hands-On" fellow and always has an ear toward the sounds of his equipment. Never bored with the sound of his tractor's exhaust..and just as well..he could not listen to a radio, even if he wanted..!!
Am I correct, so far..???
Ron.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mike plotner Regular
Joined: 19 May 2012 Posts: 105
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:54 pm Post subject: Re: Tractor Comparison's |
|
|
Case 730, D-19, then everything else |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jerry 4 Guest
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:39 pm Post subject: Re: Tractor Comparison's |
|
|
FORD 5000 sould be at the top of the list |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pete76NY Long Time User
Joined: 19 Aug 2007 Posts: 1341
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:42 pm Post subject: Re: Tractor Comparison's |
|
|
I'm not experienced with a 1650 or any Oliver really so not qualified to speak there, but I know they have an excellent reputation.
As far as the others go...I guess it would depend on what the bulk of the work I was going to be doing with it was: lot's of field work or chore type work.
Certainly the 5000 and the D19 are capable of the field work, but need to be weighted up pretty good to compete with the others from a traction and hold back stand point, but are the most handy for chore type work.
Lot's of field work in larger fields, and assuming the 560 has the updated rearend, I would have to rate the 560 and the 730 Deere as capable and I love 'em both, but both are essentially updated technology from the '30s and '40s while the Case 730 (and I imagine the 1650) are more modern and comfortable and would be better compared with a 3020 and a newer IH.
So I guess my answer from a working standpoint would be the 730 Case or the 5000 Ford. Since I don't have to work 'em any more, and just like to play at working with them, if I had my pick of only one I'd take the JD 730 1st and the Case 730 2nd, but I'd like to have 'em all to make comparisons over the next several years! LOL
I know this...when it's time to replace the clutch, the JD wins hands down! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bret4207 Tractor Expert
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 3088 Location: St Lawrence Valley, Northern NY
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:43 am Post subject: Re: Tractor Comparison's |
|
|
Why compare the 71 hp D19 to the 56 hp Case 730? The D17 would be closer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kevin B from Illinois Regular
Joined: 03 Sep 2011 Posts: 416
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:36 am Post subject: Re: Tractor Comparison's |
|
|
Your correct I should have made it the case 830, but the rest are all comparable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bret4207 Tractor Expert
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 3088 Location: St Lawrence Valley, Northern NY
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:54 am Post subject: Re: Tractor Comparison's |
|
|
The 830 was only 64, the 900 was 70 and 930 was about 80. I'd still take the 830, but a 930 would be a better comparison if the 19 was turned up. The 560 is only about 63 too. A 656 would be a better comparison. I'd actually be happy with any but the Deere 830. A 3020 would have been a better comparison to a D19. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
|
Discount Prices for Parts! You can help support this extensive website by purchasing your tractor parts, manuals and merchandise from our [ Antique Tractor Store ] or call our friendly sales staff toll free (800) 853-2651. [ More Info ]
|
YT Home
| Tractor Manuals
| Tractor Parts
| Forum Home
Copyright © 1997-2013 Yesterday's Tractor Co. - A Washington State Corporation
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters
|
|
|