Tractor   
 Parts
We have the parts you need to repair your tractor.  Click Here or call 800-853-2651
Yesterday's Tractors

   Allis Chalmers Case Cockshutt Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   H. Ferguson John Deere Massey Minn. Moline Oliver All The Rest

Marketplace
Tractor Manuals
Tractor Parts
Classified Ads
Photo Ads

Shop for Parts:

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journal
Tractor Town
Your Stories
Show & Pull Guide
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
3-Point Specs
Paint Codes
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Related Sites
The Tractor Shed
TractorLinks.com
Ford N-Series Club
Garden Tractors
Today's Tractors
Classic Trucks
Kountry Life

Enter your email address to receive our newsletter!
subscribe
unsubscribe

Content Guide
Picture List - TOC
Ad Archives - TOC
Manuals - TOC

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Traditional YT Forum ViewClassic View   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

This is the modern view of the Yesterday's Tractors Forums. Just login with your YT Userid and password to post. If you have trouble logging in, contact us by email to support at ytmag.com, or through the Reader Form, and we will get you going right away.

970 or 1070

 
Post new topic    Yesterday's Tractors Forum Index -> Case and David Brown
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
elkcagg
Regular


Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 112


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 4:59 am    Post subject: 970 or 1070 Reply to specific post Reply with quote

I don"t know much about these tractors. I was looking at something to be a good "fit" for round baling. What"s the better transmission, the PS or standard syncro? I"ve noticed a few for sale pretty cheap but PS issues. Something to stay clear of? Is the 970 easier on fuel or really no difference with the hp gain? Which one is better for finding parts for? 1000 rpm shaft also?
 
Back to top
View user's profile
Adirondack case guy
Tractor Guru


Joined: 04 Mar 2010
Posts: 4583


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 6:03 am    Post subject: Re: 970 or 1070 Reply to specific post Reply with quote

The 9/1070 tractors are the same except the engines. 401cu.in. 970 and 451 in 1070. They both have 540/1000RPM PTOs the 8spd is not a syncro, and can be a bit mean to shift. The PS tranny is a 4spt with 3 on-the go shifts, plus a shuttle reverse. Offering 12 speeds forward, and 3 reverses (4th reverse locked out on newer tractors) The 970 was extreamly good on fuel, and has plenty of weight and power to handle a round baler even on hills. Power shift problems were minimal, if proper maintainance was done on the tranny. One thing that caused problems in the PS valve and thus clutch packs, was when an owner changed the PS filter he didn't realize there was a cold oil relief, (seperate part) that often ended up in the bottom of the drain bucket, and wasn't reinstalled in the new filter, thus the new filter did not filter the oil flowing to the control valve. Other than that they were more dependable than other brands of their size.
Loren
 
Back to top
View user's profile
mEl
Tractor Guru


Joined: 28 Sep 1998
Posts: 3695


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:01 am    Post subject: Re: 970 or 1070 Reply to specific post Reply with quote


ACG has covered the RPS issue very well, I have seen the first series powershifts go in excess of 7000 hrs with NO problems and get weary of seeing an excellent transmission maligned as it is on here at times.

The relief valve issue he mentioned happened all to often and allowed unfiltered oil to flow unimpeded into the RPS valve and become imbedded in the pilot spool bores causing sticking which if not corrected led to burnt and warped plates in the clutches, but that is just plain servicing stupidity. Later RPS unit were redesigned for even more reliability.

Some C2-C3 bolt breakage was experienced but proper assembly on a rebuild all but assured no further problems in that area.

Much has been said about the jerkiness of the RPS but anyone who has run a JD powershift would not complain about the Case's smoothness, I ran a 3020 PS and certain range shifts would bring the front wheels up .

Just my two cents and I was there through all the years these were sold and admittedly have done dozens over in my lifetime. I have more than a theoretical book knowledge. I still love the RPS.

mEl
 
Back to top
View user's profile
2290
Regular


Joined: 09 Feb 2012
Posts: 54


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 1:45 pm    Post subject: Re: 970 or 1070 Reply to specific post Reply with quote

I agree with mEl they are a good transmission. But I would try find a white 970 or 1070 they are easier to work on especially the RPS transmission.

Marlin1
 
Back to top
View user's profile
Adirondack case guy
Tractor Guru


Joined: 04 Mar 2010
Posts: 4583


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 2:35 pm    Post subject: Re: 970 or 1070 Reply to specific post Reply with quote

Marlin,
I don't see where you are coming from on easier to work on Still the same configuration (control valve on top of tranny, acess through floor board in cab or open station.) Tranny cover under PS valve needs to be removed like early 70series.) The side mounted PS control valve was only on 12-15070s and incorperated in the 90series. The 7&870s were the real bears to work on, because the platrorm mounts were shorter, (only 4 cylinders under the hood). No room to get to the bellhousing bolts and limited space to work the trans cover up and out with the shifting forks sticking down, and even harder to reinstall them. BTDT many times.
Loren
 
Back to top
View user's profile
mEl
Tractor Guru


Joined: 28 Sep 1998
Posts: 3695


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 5:59 pm    Post subject: Re: 970 or 1070 Reply to specific post Reply with quote

Adirondack case guy wrote:
(quoted from post at 15:35:46 11/10/12) Marlin,
I don't see where you are coming from on easier to work on Still the same configuration (control valve on top of tranny, acess through floor board in cab or open station.) Tranny cover under PS valve needs to be removed like early 70series.) The side mounted PS control valve was only on 12-15070s and incorperated in the 90series. The 7&870s were the real bears to work on, because the platrorm mounts were shorter, (only 4 cylinders under the hood). No room to get to the bellhousing bolts and limited space to work the trans cover up and out with the shifting forks sticking down, and even harder to reinstall them. BTDT many times.
Loren


ACG, I'm sure that what was meant was that the later were easier due to the RPS being accessable through the bell opening without removing the valve and top cover. Once the C1-C4 feed tubes are removed the carrier can be removed and the RPS simply slid off the RPS output shaft. There were a couple serial number breaks but all were simpler than the original design. 10-4 on the platform clearance issues on the 7-8s a real pain to get the cover in and out. Picking the cover up far enough to fold the forks up into the cover usually gained the needed clearance.

mEl
 
Back to top
View user's profile
Brokengun
Regular


Joined: 30 Jun 2009
Posts: 493


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:23 am    Post subject: Re: 970 or 1070 Reply to specific post Reply with quote

Both tractors would be more than enough to pull a big Round baler.

The only thing that I want to add to the comments of the others is this; if you do buy a 970 or 1070 for god sakes use only Case oil in the transmission.

Hytran Ultra maybe the best oil of its type on the market.

I bought a very cherry 1370 about 6 years ago and made the mistake of changing oil to a brand that i use in my 930 tractors.
(All I was wanting to do was have a local source for oil)

The oil was supposed to be a top grade oil.

In the end the oil eat the glue from every fiber disc in the tractor.

It was a night-mare.

A man on this board Agri-King helped me on another issue with that tractor while I was splitting it to repair the ALL of the fiber discs, so I know first hand the quality of advise that you can get from this site.

My suggestion is to go ahead and make the best deal on a Case that you can find and enjoy one of the best tractors ever made.
 
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Yesterday's Tractors Forum Index -> Case and David Brown All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Discount Prices for Parts! You can help support this extensive website by purchasing your tractor parts, manuals and merchandise from our [ Antique Tractor Store ] or call our friendly sales staff toll free (800) 853-2651. [ More Info ]

YT Home | Tractor Manuals | Tractor Parts | Forum Home

Copyright © 1997-2013 Yesterday's Tractor Co. - A Washington State Corporation

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters