|
This is the modern view of the Yesterday's Tractors Forums. Just login with your YT Userid and password to post. If you have trouble logging in, contact us by email to support at ytmag.com, or through the Reader Form, and we will get you going right away.
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
elkcagg Regular
Joined: 27 Jul 2010 Posts: 112
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 4:59 am Post subject: 970 or 1070 |
|
|
I don"t know much about these tractors. I was looking at something to be a good "fit" for round baling. What"s the better transmission, the PS or standard syncro? I"ve noticed a few for sale pretty cheap but PS issues. Something to stay clear of? Is the 970 easier on fuel or really no difference with the hp gain? Which one is better for finding parts for? 1000 rpm shaft also? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adirondack case guy Tractor Guru
Joined: 04 Mar 2010 Posts: 4583
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 6:03 am Post subject: Re: 970 or 1070 |
|
|
The 9/1070 tractors are the same except the engines. 401cu.in. 970 and 451 in 1070. They both have 540/1000RPM PTOs the 8spd is not a syncro, and can be a bit mean to shift. The PS tranny is a 4spt with 3 on-the go shifts, plus a shuttle reverse. Offering 12 speeds forward, and 3 reverses (4th reverse locked out on newer tractors) The 970 was extreamly good on fuel, and has plenty of weight and power to handle a round baler even on hills. Power shift problems were minimal, if proper maintainance was done on the tranny. One thing that caused problems in the PS valve and thus clutch packs, was when an owner changed the PS filter he didn't realize there was a cold oil relief, (seperate part) that often ended up in the bottom of the drain bucket, and wasn't reinstalled in the new filter, thus the new filter did not filter the oil flowing to the control valve. Other than that they were more dependable than other brands of their size.
Loren |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mEl Tractor Guru
Joined: 28 Sep 1998 Posts: 3695
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:01 am Post subject: Re: 970 or 1070 |
|
|
ACG has covered the RPS issue very well, I have seen the first series powershifts go in excess of 7000 hrs with NO problems and get weary of seeing an excellent transmission maligned as it is on here at times.
The relief valve issue he mentioned happened all to often and allowed unfiltered oil to flow unimpeded into the RPS valve and become imbedded in the pilot spool bores causing sticking which if not corrected led to burnt and warped plates in the clutches, but that is just plain servicing stupidity. Later RPS unit were redesigned for even more reliability.
Some C2-C3 bolt breakage was experienced but proper assembly on a rebuild all but assured no further problems in that area.
Much has been said about the jerkiness of the RPS but anyone who has run a JD powershift would not complain about the Case's smoothness, I ran a 3020 PS and certain range shifts would bring the front wheels up .
Just my two cents and I was there through all the years these were sold and admittedly have done dozens over in my lifetime. I have more than a theoretical book knowledge. I still love the RPS.
mEl |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
2290 Regular
Joined: 09 Feb 2012 Posts: 54
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 1:45 pm Post subject: Re: 970 or 1070 |
|
|
I agree with mEl they are a good transmission. But I would try find a white 970 or 1070 they are easier to work on especially the RPS transmission.
Marlin1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adirondack case guy Tractor Guru
Joined: 04 Mar 2010 Posts: 4583
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 2:35 pm Post subject: Re: 970 or 1070 |
|
|
Marlin,
I don't see where you are coming from on easier to work on Still the same configuration (control valve on top of tranny, acess through floor board in cab or open station.) Tranny cover under PS valve needs to be removed like early 70series.) The side mounted PS control valve was only on 12-15070s and incorperated in the 90series. The 7&870s were the real bears to work on, because the platrorm mounts were shorter, (only 4 cylinders under the hood). No room to get to the bellhousing bolts and limited space to work the trans cover up and out with the shifting forks sticking down, and even harder to reinstall them. BTDT many times.
Loren |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mEl Tractor Guru
Joined: 28 Sep 1998 Posts: 3695
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 5:59 pm Post subject: Re: 970 or 1070 |
|
|
| Adirondack case guy wrote: | (quoted from post at 15:35:46 11/10/12) Marlin,
I don't see where you are coming from on easier to work on Still the same configuration (control valve on top of tranny, acess through floor board in cab or open station.) Tranny cover under PS valve needs to be removed like early 70series.) The side mounted PS control valve was only on 12-15070s and incorperated in the 90series. The 7&870s were the real bears to work on, because the platrorm mounts were shorter, (only 4 cylinders under the hood). No room to get to the bellhousing bolts and limited space to work the trans cover up and out with the shifting forks sticking down, and even harder to reinstall them. BTDT many times.
Loren |
ACG, I'm sure that what was meant was that the later were easier due to the RPS being accessable through the bell opening without removing the valve and top cover. Once the C1-C4 feed tubes are removed the carrier can be removed and the RPS simply slid off the RPS output shaft. There were a couple serial number breaks but all were simpler than the original design. 10-4 on the platform clearance issues on the 7-8s a real pain to get the cover in and out. Picking the cover up far enough to fold the forks up into the cover usually gained the needed clearance.
mEl |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brokengun Regular
Joined: 30 Jun 2009 Posts: 493
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:23 am Post subject: Re: 970 or 1070 |
|
|
Both tractors would be more than enough to pull a big Round baler.
The only thing that I want to add to the comments of the others is this; if you do buy a 970 or 1070 for god sakes use only Case oil in the transmission.
Hytran Ultra maybe the best oil of its type on the market.
I bought a very cherry 1370 about 6 years ago and made the mistake of changing oil to a brand that i use in my 930 tractors.
(All I was wanting to do was have a local source for oil)
The oil was supposed to be a top grade oil.
In the end the oil eat the glue from every fiber disc in the tractor.
It was a night-mare.
A man on this board Agri-King helped me on another issue with that tractor while I was splitting it to repair the ALL of the fiber discs, so I know first hand the quality of advise that you can get from this site.
My suggestion is to go ahead and make the best deal on a Case that you can find and enjoy one of the best tractors ever made. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
|
Discount Prices for Parts! You can help support this extensive website by purchasing your tractor parts, manuals and merchandise from our [ Antique Tractor Store ] or call our friendly sales staff toll free (800) 853-2651. [ More Info ]
|
YT Home
| Tractor Manuals
| Tractor Parts
| Forum Home
Copyright © 1997-2013 Yesterday's Tractor Co. - A Washington State Corporation
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters
|
|
|