|
This is the modern view of the Yesterday's Tractors Forums. Just login with your YT Userid and password to post. If you have trouble logging in, contact us by email to support at ytmag.com, or through the Reader Form, and we will get you going right away.
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
redpower1990 New User
Joined: 20 Dec 2012 Posts: 6
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:12 pm Post subject: Farmall 706 engine which is better? |
|
|
I was looking at some 706 Farmalls for sale and and most have the D282 Engine in them but I found one 1967 model with the D310 german diesel in it. What are the most notable differences in these two engines and which one would be a better tractor in the long run do you think? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Janicholson Tractor Guru
Joined: 30 Jan 2004 Posts: 18205 Location: St. Cloud, MN
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 11:06 pm Post subject: Re: Farmall 706 engine which is better? |
|
|
The general consensus is in favor of the German engine. It has a great reputation, and it seems to be powerful, adjustable, and economical. Jim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Farmboy856 Regular
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 179
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:09 am Post subject: Re: Farmall 706 engine which is better? |
|
|
I agree with Jim's statement. One caution I would give you is that if the German diesel is extremely high houred and might be in need of a a rebuild in the near future, it will cost you over double for the parts versus what the parts will cost for a 282 rebuild, or at least that was what I found out 17 years ago. They are a great engine and last a long time, but they get pricey to rebuild. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kennell Long Time User
Joined: 14 Feb 2010 Posts: 535
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:12 am Post subject: Re: Farmall 706 engine which is better? |
|
|
definitely the 310. starts better with way more power. Kent |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Tomfohrde Regular
Joined: 12 Feb 2012 Posts: 89
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:54 am Post subject: Re: Farmall 706 engine which is better? |
|
|
The 310 is probably the better choice, less effort to start. The 310 in a 706 has different compression than a 686 which we had. I bought a 706 with the 282 in it and ended up with a major overhaual shortly after getting it. We had trouble getting 72 hp out of it on the dyno a week or two after the overhaul. Ran really well but smoked terribly when getting near the 72 mark. The 686 if you didn't work it hard enough would ooze black from unburn't fuel on the muffler. It would pull the 4-16 easier at the same fuel as the 706. We had the 686 resleeved so it would start easier to the 706 sleeve/ piston assemblies.My former neighbor still uses his 706 with a 310 for chores alot yet even today. I don't think you would go wrong with either but the 310 is a little better from my experience. Hope this helps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mkirsch Tractor Guru
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 8056
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:23 am Post subject: Re: Farmall 706 engine which is better? |
|
|
Both engines are "cold blooded."
The D310 is the more desirable from a collector standpoint but D282 has the advantage of glow plugs for cold weather starting. A healthy D282 with good glow plugs will start when a D310 will just run the battery dead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Baelee05 Regular
Joined: 15 Mar 2011 Posts: 221
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:51 am Post subject: Re: Farmall 706 engine which is better? |
|
|
Both are good engines the 310 just happens to be a little better. For starters it doesn"t ues glow plugs which can be a pain in the butt. However if you are vigilant about keeping your glow plugs and cables in really good shape the 282 will start okay with patience. The 310 will start really well with either a block or tank heater. If you have neither of those things the 310 is not going to start very well in cold weather. I would not hesitate to buy a well maintained 310 with 5000 or less hours of running time. You start pushing 7000 to 8000 hours and you could be getting close to overhaul time which will be ungodly expensive even if you can find all of the parts. The 282 is okay but I would much rather have a 310 with some life left in it. 282"s also tend to have some head gasket issues. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DeltaRed Tractor Guru
Joined: 25 Feb 2010 Posts: 6407 Location: Delta,colorado
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:32 am Post subject: Re: Farmall 706 engine which is better? |
|
|
310 hands down.I've owned both.310 has more power longer life,starts way better-no contest.Mine is turbocharged,puts out 95+horse and has over 10,000 hrs.There is no overhaul on even the distant horizon.I've owned it for over 30 years and will keep it till the end.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the tractor vet Tractor Guru
Joined: 24 May 2000 Posts: 11518
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:59 am Post subject: Re: Farmall 706 engine which is better? |
|
|
If it were me it would be the 310 hands down if i was going diesel. and if it was me and there was a choice between a D282 and a 291 gasser it would be the gasser over the D282 . But that is just me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
|
Discount Prices for Parts! You can help support this extensive website by purchasing your tractor parts, manuals and merchandise from our [ Antique Tractor Store ] or call our friendly sales staff toll free (800) 853-2651. [ More Info ]
|
YT Home
| Tractor Manuals
| Tractor Parts
| Forum Home
Copyright © 1997-2013 Yesterday's Tractor Co. - A Washington State Corporation
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters
|
|
|