|
This is the modern view of the Yesterday's Tractors Forums. Just login with your YT Userid and password to post. If you have trouble logging in, contact us by email to support at ytmag.com, or through the Reader Form, and we will get you going right away.
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Russ from MN Tractor Expert
Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Posts: 1727
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:07 am Post subject: Question for John T |
|
|
Recently someone made a statement about balancing the load in a panel. Lets say you are not using any power for anything else, but you have a 1500W 120V heater in a pump house. Would it cost more to operate than a 1500W 240V baseboard heater? (assuming they were on the same amount of time) I realize you should try to balance the load in a panel somewhat but in is not always possible all the time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Greg K Long Time User
Joined: 04 Jan 2012 Posts: 718
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:17 am Post subject: Re: Question for John T |
|
|
sorry not John T here but anyway the answer is no. 1500 watts is the measure of power used whether is be 120 volt 240 volt or 12 volts. Watts are calculated by multiplying the volts times the Amps. so a 1500 watt heater running on 120 volts draws 12.5 amps on one phase of power. A 1500 watt heater on 240 volts draws 6.25 amps on TWO legs of power, equaling the same total power used.
The reason this could save you money is that now you can run a smaller wire to supply your heater if y run it 240 volt. Also with motors they start easier with 240 volt single phase power. A motor will start even easier with 3 phase power, but that is a whole different subject.
Now my question for John T is this. If I use a 100 watt bulb for a heater in one area, and use a resistive 100 watt heater in another, is there any difference in efficiency? Just wondering since when you make light with an incandescent light the heat is a by-product and then potentially wasted(thermal inefficiency?) If used as a heater, then is the light a by-product and also a waste? No real reason for this just wondering |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CH(upstate,NY) Regular
Joined: 14 Dec 2007 Posts: 283
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:26 am Post subject: Re: Question for John T |
|
|
Nope, if you have a 100 amp panel, you can draw 100 amps from each leg without taxing the panel. That being said, it is good practice to "balance" the load.
BSEE and, I'm not a lawyerrrrrr. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob M Tractor Guru
Joined: 28 Dec 1997 Posts: 6917 Location: Chili, NY
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:51 am Post subject: Re: Question for John T |
|
|
| Greg K wrote: | | Now my question for John T is this. If I use a 100 watt bulb for a heater in one area, and use a resistive 100 watt heater in another, is there any difference in efficiency? Just wondering since when you make light with an incandescent light the heat is a by-product and then potentially wasted (thermal inefficiency?) If used as a heater, then is the light a by-product and also a waste? No real reason for this just wondering |
The lamp and the heater will be almost equally efficient as space heaters.
Reason: The luminous efficacy of a 100 watt incandescent bulb is about 3%. This means 97% of the wattage going into the lamp is "wasted" as heat. Further, if the bulb is located inside an enclosure so no light escapes (like in a pump house), the 3% of the input wattage converted to light is reconverted to heat when it is absorbed inside the enclosure, which further warms the enclosure contents. In this case the lamp and the heater will be equally efficient. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Greg K Long Time User
Joined: 04 Jan 2012 Posts: 718
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 12:41 pm Post subject: Re: Question for John T |
|
|
OK that answers that. Thanks for the answer. Now the next question. If I say something and my wife is not around to hear it, am I still wrong?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MarkB_MI Tractor Guru
Joined: 29 Aug 2004 Posts: 6279
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 12:41 pm Post subject: Re: Question for John T |
|
|
The main reason to balance the load is to minimize voltage drop. Let's say you have two 100 amp loads on a 200 amp panel. If you have both loads on one side, you have 200 amps on one leg, 200 amps on neutral and zero amps on the other leg. Let's say you have 10 milliohms resistance on each of your service cables back to the transformer. In that case you would have a 2 volt drop on the hot current-carrying leg and a 2 volt drop on the neutral leg, leaving you with a total voltage drop of 4 volts.
Now let's see what happens if you split the load on both sides of the panel: Now you have 100 amps on each hot leg and zero amps on the neutral. This gives you a voltage drop of 1 volt on each leg and ZERO volts drop on the neutral. The total voltage drop on each leg is only ONE volt. By splitting the load and eliminating the neutral current, you reduced the voltage drop by 75 percent!
Of course, if John T chimes in, he'll probably add that he likes things to be symmetrical just out of general principles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob M Tractor Guru
Joined: 28 Dec 1997 Posts: 6917 Location: Chili, NY
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 1:00 pm Post subject: Re: Question for John T |
|
|
| Greg K wrote: | (quoted from post at 16:41:09 01/06/13) OK that answers that. Thanks for the answer. Now the next question. If I say something and my wife is not around to hear it, am I still wrong?  |
Absolutely! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Russ from MN Tractor Expert
Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Posts: 1727
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 6:05 pm Post subject: Re: Question for John T |
|
|
I think I know the answer to that! The light bulb is just as efficient as the heater as long as no light escapes! some of the heat is radiant and it could carry heat out a window, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John T Tractor Guru
Joined: 14 Dec 1998 Posts: 12288
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 8:02 pm Post subject: Re: Question for John T |
|
|
Geeee somethings wrong,,me and my fellow sparkies pretty much agree!!!!!!!!! GREAT MINDS THINK ALIKE LOL
I just pulled the RV with my Grand Am in tow into Wal Mart at Dalton GA, gonna have a BEER AND go to bed, drive ahead to N Florida tomorrow
OKAY as posted anytime you reduce or eliminate I Squared R energy heat loss anywhere including Neutral youre putting the energy to use versus wasting it as heat sooooooooo if the load is balanced theres no Neutral current therefore no I Squared heat losses in it LOoKS LIKE WE ALL AGREE
YES its best to balance the load as the other fine gents told you
Since you pay for watt hours, the cost is the same if ran at 120 or 240 EXCEPT FOR THE ABOVE INFO However, even if you loose that I Squared R as heat in a wire heck it goes to heat anyway, so if the wires in the room YOU BREAK EVEN. You still got the heat from the heater or the wire
My Mechanical engineer buddy Bob M has ya covered on the .light bulb,,,The bulb produces heat and light energy so if the light escapes you lost that as far as heat is concerned
No time for chat now cuz I could talk this subject for hours but I got other stuff to do
JohnT |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
George Marsh Tractor Expert
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 Posts: 3006 Location: terre haute
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:49 am Post subject: Re: Question for John T |
|
|
JohnT,
Someone on the IH forum was talking about Florida Flywheeler. Told him to ask you.
If you don't have your load balanced, you may drag your rear bumber and that comsumes more power, not to mention what it does to the bumper:).
Have fun and have a safe trip.
George |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John T Tractor Guru
Joined: 14 Dec 1998 Posts: 12288
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:19 am Post subject: Re: Question for John T |
|
|
Mornin George,,,,,,Yes I will be at the February Florida Flywheelers (about my 12th year) Jan 15 to 20 but the bigger show is the one in February. WE stay all week in the RV and drive the golf cart all around and we play music twice a day, Im in hog heaven...........
Hard to balance the load in my RV, depends on if my first wife is sitting in the front or rear lol
John T |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
showcrop Tractor Guru
Joined: 13 Dec 2000 Posts: 7324
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:48 am Post subject: Re: Question for John T |
|
|
I am the one who posted about balancing the load. I could be wrong, Greg, John, others, but you may want to check with your utility on how they measure demand. Around here the demand charge is a hefty part of the bill and elec. bills in NH are about as hefty as they get. It is my understanding that they are measuring both sides to neutral and whichever is the greater is what bumps the demand. Hence if they are kept as close as possible demand will be lower. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buickanddeere Tractor Guru
Joined: 31 May 2003 Posts: 23629 Location: in front of computer
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:25 am Post subject: Re: Question for John T |
|
|
Ideally both line 1, line 2 and if three phase line 3 should have the same current, that way the neutral current will be zero.
Will little to no neutral current there is less tendency for live stock to receive tingle voltage shocks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
|
Discount Prices for Parts! You can help support this extensive website by purchasing your tractor parts, manuals and merchandise from our [ Antique Tractor Store ] or call our friendly sales staff toll free (800) 853-2651. [ More Info ]
|
YT Home
| Tractor Manuals
| Tractor Parts
| Forum Home
Copyright © 1997-2013 Yesterday's Tractor Co. - A Washington State Corporation
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters
|
|
|