|
This is the modern view of the Yesterday's Tractors Forums. Just login with your YT Userid and password to post. If you have trouble logging in, contact us by email to support at ytmag.com, or through the Reader Form, and we will get you going right away.
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
George Marsh Tractor Expert
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 Posts: 2997 Location: terre haute
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:03 am Post subject: 787 and Li-ion |
|
|
Seems like the 787 fires may be linked to the Li-ion batteries being overcharged. Or is the Li-ion battery have an issue with thermal run away?
When it's cold, my charger won't charge Li-ion batteries. It has to be very cold at 35000 feet.
I have 2 Li-ion batteries that are 4 years old. They hold their charge and take a full charge. However, they can't hold a candle to the batteries found in a Toyota prius, Ni-MH.
The price of Ni-MH batteries is close to the price of Ni-cd, but last for years. My 5 year old Ni-MH batteries are as good as the day I bought them.
Do you think Boeing will use Ni-MH?
George |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MarkB_MI Tractor Guru
Joined: 29 Aug 2004 Posts: 6276
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:35 am Post subject: Re: 787 and Li-ion |
|
|
George, the batteries in question are within the pressurized fuselage, so ambient temperature is not an issue. And should the aircraft lose pressure, the passengers and crew are at much greater risk of dying than those batteries.
The choice of battery type is an engineering decision based on a number of factors, primarily cost and weight. Of course, mass reduction is an overriding concern in aircraft design, second only to safety. Lithium ion offers the highest energy density of the commercially available battery technologies, so it's hardly surprising that Boeing went with li-ion. My guess it was a global decision: "every battery in the aircraft must be li-ion". I don't think the batteries in question are that large, so they could have gone with a different technology for those particular batteries with a small weight penalty.
I doubt Boeing will switch to a different technology. More likely they will go with a modified battery or charging system. Switching technologies would require modifications to the charging system, so there's little to be saved in terms of cost by switching to NiMH.
With regards to your Prius, a hybrid like the Prius doesn't need a huge amount of storage capacity. Ni-MH makes a lot of sense, since it offers very good energy density, is reasonably cheap and reliable. On the other hand, a plug-in EV or hybrid like the Volt needs a lot of storage capacity. That's why the Volt uses li-ion batteries. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ken Macfarlane Tractor Expert
Joined: 21 Jul 2004 Posts: 2733
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:47 am Post subject: Re: 787 and Li-ion |
|
|
I've got 20 year old Nicads that still sort of work but my 10 year old NIMH's are all garbage. They just don't seem to have a good lifespan.
I moved all my tools to lithium ion, they have been great. The cold weather isn't the best for them but warm them up even a bit and they are fine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
guido Tractor Expert
Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 3280
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:20 am Post subject: Re: 787 and Li-ion |
|
|
Hello George Marsh,
I Have NiCad's, they work for me!
I get extra packs whenever someone gets tired of them. I recycle and make one out of two or three.
Original packs are as old as your Li-ion, and still going strong! With 4 packs I think I can drill all day,
Guido.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scotc Tractor Expert
Joined: 18 May 2003 Posts: 1952
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:38 am Post subject: Re: 787 and Li-ion |
|
|
Somehow I doubt that the entire fuselage is heated, even though it is all pressurized. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BigMarv1085 Regular
Joined: 06 Nov 2007 Posts: 315
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:45 am Post subject: Re: 787 and Li-ion |
|
|
it doesn't take a whole lot of smoke to make a whole cabin seem as if its on fire. Most likely its getting over charged some how. The MD 88 still have a problem with the generator control units going bad. Use to have to do a test on one every time it landed. It will be figured out shortly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GarryinNC Regular
Joined: 04 Mar 2008 Posts: 148 Location: Davie County,NC
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:24 pm Post subject: Re: 787 and Li-ion |
|
|
All of the volume contained between the forward and aft pressure bulkheads is heated/cooled. Air is bled off the compressor sections on the engines and run through an air cycle machine if it needs to be cooled. That is true on transport category jets since the 707 days, but I think I did read that the 787 is somewhat different. It may use an electrically driven compressor to accomplish AirCon/Pressurization.
The FAA has certified 2 engine jets for over water operation since the advent of the Boeing 757/767 under a program called ETOPS, for extended range operations. Under a 180 minute ETOPS rule you can lose an engine and be allowed to fly for 180 minutes at single engine cruise to get to the nearest land.
Seems like the biggest worry with this 787 battery problem would be to have a battery fire or thermal runaway over the ocean and still have to fly 3 hours or so to land. UPS lost an airplane in Dubai when some computer batteries they were carrying as cargo shorted or ran away and started a fire. The pilots overflew a suitable airport while trying to get back to their departure airport. They were overcome by the smoke/fumes which was believed to be so thick they could not see, even with O2 masks and smoke goggles.
Last edited by GarryinNC on Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:08 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MarkB_MI Tractor Guru
Joined: 29 Aug 2004 Posts: 6276
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 1:11 pm Post subject: Re: 787 and Li-ion |
|
|
Did you ever have your luggage frozen solid when you arrived? The entire pressure vessel uses the same conditioned air, including the baggage compartment. If it didn't, Fido and Fluffy would arrive as freeze-dried pets. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buickanddeere Tractor Guru
Joined: 31 May 2003 Posts: 23624 Location: in front of computer
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:58 pm Post subject: Re: 787 and Li-ion |
|
|
No air bleed on the 787 . It's all electric driven everything with
1.45MW capacity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buickanddeere Tractor Guru
Joined: 31 May 2003 Posts: 23624 Location: in front of computer
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:02 pm Post subject: Re: 787 and Li-ion |
|
|
Depends on the plane. Not every cargo hold is pressurized and/or heated on every aircraft. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buickanddeere Tractor Guru
Joined: 31 May 2003 Posts: 23624 Location: in front of computer
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:09 pm Post subject: Re: 787 and Li-ion |
|
|
Just simple matter of too many watts of power pushed into the battery and could not dissipate the heat.
System voltage has to be dropped to limit charging current and heating.
There should have been rtd's or thermal couples throughout the battery pack to monitor voltage.
Given the price of fuel over the lifetime of the airframe. Manufactures go to extreme lengths such as the lithium batteries and carbon fibre composite structure.
The more complicated you make anything, the more it will come back to bite you in the behind. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GarryinNC Regular
Joined: 04 Mar 2008 Posts: 148 Location: Davie County,NC
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:24 pm Post subject: Re: 787 and Li-ion |
|
|
What passenger carrying, pressurized, jet transport aircraft does not have the cargo areas pressurized/heated? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
big fred Tractor Guru
Joined: 22 May 1998 Posts: 13804
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:50 pm Post subject: Re: 787 and Li-ion |
|
|
One that's parked overnight in Greenland. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GarryinNC Regular
Joined: 04 Mar 2008 Posts: 148 Location: Davie County,NC
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:13 pm Post subject: Re: 787 and Li-ion |
|
|
| big fred wrote: | | (quoted from post at 19:50:44 01/20/13) One that's parked overnight in Greenland. |
I guess that would apply to everywhere, not just Greenland. I stand corrected. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
steve706 Regular
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 Posts: 194
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:53 pm Post subject: Re: 787 and Li-ion |
|
|
Out of interest buickanddeere, are you an AME? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
|
Discount Prices for Parts! You can help support this extensive website by purchasing your tractor parts, manuals and merchandise from our [ Antique Tractor Store ] or call our friendly sales staff toll free (800) 853-2651. [ More Info ]
|
YT Home
| Tractor Manuals
| Tractor Parts
| Forum Home
Copyright © 1997-2013 Yesterday's Tractor Co. - A Washington State Corporation
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters
|
|
|