Yesterday's Tractor Co.
Shop Now View Cart
   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 9N,2N,8N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Traditional YT Forum ViewClassic View   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile    Log inLog in 

Opinions on 400 Wide Front


 
Post new topic    
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SgtMoe
Regular


Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 40
Location: Vinton, IA

Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sat Apr 15, 2017 7:20 am    Post subject: Opinions on 400 Wide Front Reply to specific post Reply with quote

I am looking to replace the narrow front on my 400 with a wide front. Currently there are two for sale near me: a Norden off of an M that would bolt right on or a Schwartz off of a 560. I have read the 560 front can be adapted to the 400 so I went to the A&I website and started looking at part numbers. The front saddle, steering bolster bracket and center tube appear to be the same and the rear saddle is different but a new one is still available and would be easy enough to change. However the spindles are different with the M-450 WFE having 13 7/8" tall spindles and the 560 having 11 7/8" tall spindles. Has anyone used the 560 wide front on a 400 and does it work ok with the 2" shorter spindles? Any opinions on the Norden wide front? The only reservation I have with the Norden is getting parts.
 
Back to top
View user's profile
rustyfarmall
Tractor Guru


Joined: 07 Feb 2003
Posts: 27433


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sat Apr 15, 2017 9:20 am    Post subject: Re: Opinions on 400 Wide Front Reply to specific post Reply with quote

SgtMoe wrote:
(quoted from post at 08:20:05 04/15/17) I am looking to replace the narrow front on my 400 with a wide front. Currently there are two for sale near me: a Norden off of an M that would bolt right on or a Schwartz off of a 560. I have read the 560 front can be adapted to the 400 so I went to the A&I website and started looking at part numbers. The front saddle, steering bolster bracket and center tube appear to be the same and the rear saddle is different but a new one is still available and would be easy enough to change. However the spindles are different with the M-450 WFE having 13 7/8" tall spindles and the 560 having 11 7/8" tall spindles. Has anyone used the 560 wide front on a 400 and does it work ok with the 2" shorter spindles? Any opinions on the Norden wide front? The only reservation I have with the Norden is getting parts.


Norden is obsolete. NO parts available.
 
Back to top
View user's profile
David G
Tractor Guru


Joined: 11 Jan 2008
Posts: 29337


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sat Apr 15, 2017 9:25 am    Post subject: Re: Opinions on 400 Wide Front Reply to specific post Reply with quote

Why not get an IH?
 
Back to top
View user's profile
Roger Tomfohrde
Long Time User


Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 953


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:00 am    Post subject: Re: Opinions on 400 Wide Front Reply to specific post Reply with quote

The 2 inches would drop the front end of your tractor with the schwartz, would need to change the rear saddle and have the correct hubs. I have had all three and felt the Norden would turn shorter, but would
not really want to put a heavy loader on it as it is a tad bit lighter in the spindles. I never had breakage on the Norden even though it was on a 706 Diesel. The two inches is because the 706-560-460 had cast
parts of the front that the bolts mount the front to that stick below the frame which an M and 400-50 don't have. The tie rod ends on a Norden can be replaced with other brands so that is not usually a
problem. I guess it all depends on your use. I did have a 560 with the Norden and a 2001 loader in it but respected the wide front so I did not break it. We broke a Shwartz on a 460 which has lighter spindles
with the same loader but was in a frozen field trying to retrieve a broke spreader. Just some ideas.
 
Back to top
View user's profile
SgtMoe
Regular


Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 40
Location: Vinton, IA

Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sat Apr 15, 2017 2:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Opinions on 400 Wide Front Reply to specific post Reply with quote

I use the tractor for making hay and I am tired of the narrow front going down the center of the wind row when mowing and raking. I currently do not plan on putting a loader on the tractor. Both wide fronts come with 6 bolt hubs. I searched and the tie rods are still available for the Norden wide front but I wouldn't know about spindle bushings, thrust bearings or wheel bearings unless I buy it and take measurements when/if I need those parts which is why I was leaning towards the Schwartz until I saw the spindles were shorter. Might just have to wait until a Schwartz for a M-450 comes up for sale.
 
Back to top
View user's profile
D Slater
Tractor Guru


Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 7018


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2017 11:48 am    Post subject: Re: Opinions on 400 Wide Front Reply to specific post Reply with quote

Lots of times a M through 450 tractor will set leveler with the 560 wide front. Depends on the tires used. Have checked before and a M with 600-16 fronts and a rear tire giving 30-1/16 inches from floor to center of rear axle and a SMTA to 450 type front axle, put the rear of frame rail around 1/4 inch lower than front of frame rail. As you can see the front end is a 1/4 inch higher in about 3 feet. Most if not all M with 13.6 x 38 won't be up to 30-1/16 at rear axle, more like 28 or 29 inches and will have a higher front end. Using some disc type wheels on the wide front will let you put enough rubber on the front to raise the front if wanted higher. Like you said the 560 rear support bolting to frame rails is to tall for a M. If your a welder cut the bottom off a 560 support the needed amount. Weld a steel plate back on for the ball socket pivot and drill the holes. Swartz turns sharper than a IH though.
 
Back to top
View user's profile
caterpillar guy
Tractor Guru


Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 7159


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2017 2:11 am    Post subject: Re: Opinions on 400 Wide Front Reply to specific post Reply with quote

For raking if you drive to one side then the front end is off a windrow to rake. You can not do that for a swath though it will still be on the hay.
 
Back to top
View user's profile
BarnyardEngineering
Tractor Guru


Joined: 23 Mar 2016
Posts: 7028


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2017 4:02 am    Post subject: Re: Opinions on 400 Wide Front Reply to specific post Reply with quote

If we were anywhere near each other, I would trade you the wide front off my Super M for your narrow front, not even up mind you, but we could work something out.
 
Back to top
View user's profile
SgtMoe
Regular


Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 40
Location: Vinton, IA

Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 12:17 pm    Post subject: Re: Opinions on 400 Wide Front Reply to specific post Reply with quote

I am in east central Iowa, where are you located?
 
Back to top
View user's profile
:   
Post new topic    Yesterday's Tractors Forum Index -> Farmall & International Harvester (IHC) All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

YT Home  |  Forums

Modern View Forum powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters