View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
4010 puller Tractor Expert
Joined: 27 Sep 2004 Posts: 1558
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2020 8:17 am Post subject: Oliver 77 |
|
|
What all can be done to 77 gas engine to get more
power if a guy had one tore down to rebuild? Are
some boring/stroking factory engine or moving up to
the 310? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
supermpuller Regular
Joined: 28 Apr 2001 Posts: 420
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2020 11:45 am Post subject: Re: Oliver 77 |
|
|
400 cu. and bigger |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SPT Regular
Joined: 05 Jun 2002 Posts: 345
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:24 pm Post subject: Re: Oliver 77 |
|
|
Neighbor had 77 with 440 cubes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VicS Tractor Guru
Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 5328
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:51 pm Post subject: Re: Oliver 77 |
|
|
A 320 is better. But a 426 is better yet. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dblair Tractor Expert
Joined: 07 Nov 2007 Posts: 2842
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2020 2:08 pm Post subject: Re: Oliver 77 |
|
|
to get to about 75hp port the valves to 880 and increase the compression to 12 to 1 . |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jd man wis Long Time User
Joined: 27 Apr 2014 Posts: 677
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:12 am Post subject: Re: Oliver 77 |
|
|
They pull good with the up date kit that use to be from MW kit. I would frist check on the class you want to pull because you can build a big motor only to be held down because of a speed limit an then you might have to drop a great and have to much power an spin out. I know that a fresh up motor in it and running good that in a stock class there hard to beat. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gary Mitchell Tractor Expert
Joined: 05 Jun 2000 Posts: 1900 Location: St Clair Co. Missouri
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2020 8:37 am Post subject: Re: Oliver 77 |
|
|
I had 330 cubes in mine, 770 head and manifolds, larger MS carb, and it had more than enuf hp to pull in any of the classes I wanted to fool with. This was in the 3.5 mph era for class III classes. I'm satisfied that 5 MPH would have improved the performance. gm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
560Dennis Regular
Joined: 10 Dec 2015 Posts: 428
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:36 pm Post subject: Re: Oliver 77 |
|
|
Wow 😳 440 almost like those John Deere g with 1200 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
forty40 Regular
Joined: 01 Jan 2013 Posts: 239 Location: Wellsville, NY
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2020 10:57 am Post subject: Re: Oliver 77 |
|
|
Antique tractor pulling...build what you want, how you want to build it. Above 3-1/2 mph, a 77 motor will require at least stroking and compression increase along with a cam regrind. A stock 310 is 100 more cu-in and 2x the hp of a super 77 motor so thats the beginning. Stroking, boring, custom sleeves, pistons, and rods cost about the same for either. 12 port stock head out performs the best reworked 9 port on the flowbench. Drawbacks to the 310 are weight +200 lbs and spare parts like a good used crank are nearly impossible to find without buying a complete engine. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
4010 puller Tractor Expert
Joined: 27 Sep 2004 Posts: 1558
Report to Moderator
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2020 9:51 am Post subject: Re: Oliver 77 |
|
|
Hi Vic, are both your tractors running and ready to go or is the allis still down? You can email me if you would like. Did you ever find that magazine with the 320 article in it? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|