Yesterday's Tractor Co.
Shop Now View Cart
   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 9N,2N,8N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Traditional YT Forum ViewClassic View   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile    Log inLog in 

WC horsepower


 
Post new topic    
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
630rich
Regular


Joined: 18 Apr 2008
Posts: 454


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 6:58 pm    Post subject: WC horsepower Reply to specific post Reply with quote

I have a 1945 WC that we have rebuilt with .125 over pistons, they are flat tops, we also rebuilt the carb and mag. Did I gain any power?? If so, give me a rough estimate. thanks guys
 
Back to top
View user's profile
Jeff Z.
Regular


Joined: 20 Nov 2007
Posts: 404


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:08 pm    Post subject: Re: WC horsepower Reply to specific post Reply with quote

The hp gain is probably so insignificant you won't even notice it.
 
Back to top
View user's profile
630rich
Regular


Joined: 18 Apr 2008
Posts: 454


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:17 pm    Post subject: Re: WC horsepower Reply to specific post Reply with quote

We also had the head done also, and worked the rpms a bit.
 
Back to top
View user's profile
old
Tractor Guru


Joined: 12 Mar 2000
Posts: 86970
Location: Lake of the Ozarks area of MO

Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:45 pm    Post subject: Re: WC horsepower Reply to specific post Reply with quote

You may have gained a HP or 2 but thats probably about it. 1-5HP increase you will not notice much if any
 
Back to top
View user's profile
MLPANKEY
Guest






Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:50 pm    Post subject: Re: WC horsepower Reply to specific post Reply with quote

yeap you increased the horespower probably by 5 to seven percent. increasing the bore size should have raised the compression maybe a half a point also .
 
Back to top
MLPANKEY
Guest






Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:55 pm    Post subject: Re: WC horsepower Reply to specific post Reply with quote

raising the rpms will give signifigant gains if you raised say to d17 or 170 rpms. even though those tractors had the 226 instead of the 201 .the 201 still benefeits from the increase.
 
Back to top
ohio
Tractor Expert


Joined: 15 Aug 2002
Posts: 2245
Location: N E Ohio

Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:27 am    Post subject: Re: WC horsepower Reply to specific post Reply with quote

The old M&W kits promised around 7-10 for wc, wd if i remember.
 
Back to top
View user's profile
Texas Denny
Long Time User


Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 868


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:36 am    Post subject: Re: WC horsepower Reply to specific post Reply with quote

630rich, I've read all of the posts here and it looks like I am going to disagree with a lot of people. My opinions on this one will be based on some facts and some experience.

Fact #1: The displacement of a WC engine with 4.125 cylinders is increased from 201 to 214. That is more than half way to the WD-45 displacement of 226. If they maintained the compression ration of the original piston, it would suggest a 7% increase in horsepower - from about 28 to 30. Fact #2: Every 4 1/8 piston I've ever seen is a flat top which will provide a significant increase in compression ration. Theoretically, when compression ratio is increased, the power output increases by the same ratio. Since we don't know the after compression ratio, it is a guess as to how much horsepower will increase from the compression ratio change. Fact #4, M&W was one of (or maybe only) piston and sleeve maker in the 50's that pushed the larger cylinder. They advertised a 7 horsepower increase for the WD and the only difference that I am aware of between the WD motor and the WC motor was RPM. The difference between a WD and a WD-45 is about 8.3 HP. So the M&W cylinders almost get to the WD-45 horsepower. Since you've made an adjustment to rpm, you may have reached the rpm of the WD - RPM being the major engine difference between the WC and WD.

With all of the above facts, it seems quite likely that your horsepower has improved significantly. The starting hp was 29.93 on the belt. Changing displacement, rpm and compression, may have boosted you from 6 to 10 horsepower - put hp higher than the WD but perhaps a bit less than the WD-45.

When I was in high school, my family farmed with two 1939 WC tractors. I lived in southern Minnesota in black soil country. We pulled 2-16 plows in second gear accept in alfalfa when we sometimes had to go in first on old hay fields. We pulled a 10 foot tandem disk. When we had one of the WC's rebuilt with 4 1/8 cylinders, that tractor could pull the 2-16 plow in third gear (didn't do it except for test because it threw the dirt too far). The rebuilt tractor could pull the 10 foot disk in third gear easily - no strain in 3rd with either the disk or plow. Since the advertised speeds for 2nd and 3rd are 3.5 and 4.75 mph, that WC had an increased hp of 35% or about 10 hp. Remember, we had it rebuilt because it was tired so it probably didn't have 29 hp to start. We also bought a WD with 4 1/8 cylinders. That WC could keep up with the WD on all tasks - couldn't observe a difference. Later on, we rebuilt the other WC with exactly the same results.

Now for opinion. The original WC hp is listed as 29.33. Based on what you have said, I'd guess your hp to be between 37 and 40. You did all these - displacement, compression and rpm. Increase any of these and hp theoretically will increase proportionately. Increase them all, and the effect is additive.
 
Back to top
View user's profile
630rich
Regular


Joined: 18 Apr 2008
Posts: 454


Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:59 am    Post subject: Re: WC horsepower Reply to specific post Reply with quote

thanks everyone, really helpful...gotta find a dyno!
 
Back to top
View user's profile
MLPANKEY
Guest






Report to Moderator

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 3:14 pm    Post subject: Re: WC horsepower Reply to specific post Reply with quote

texas denny sounds like you agreed with me .
 
Back to top
:   
Post new topic    Yesterday's Tractors Forum Index -> Allis Chalmers All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

YT Home  |  Forums

Modern View Forum powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters