Hemmjo
Member
I have read the battery chainsaw thread. I think this discussion warrants a new thread. I am managing about 7 acres of wood lot. I planted it in 1994 in a corn/soybean field behind our house. Mostly oak, maple, hickory, sweet gum, sycamore spruce and pine. Used to have some ash but of course they are all died but the roots are sending up numerous shoots. I am letting the original 4-5 acres expand naturally with volunteer trees to make about 7 acres total of woodland mostly oaks and sweet gum in this part.
I have a good Husqvarna chainsaw and also a Husqvarna pole saw. In addition I have a 3-point mounted wood chipper. I use pole saw to trim branches up to 16+ feet off the ground to make good logging timber for someone in the furure.
My problem is I have a bunch of invasive pear trees that are invading the younger woods. The older woods is fighting them off very well. They have gotten out of hand in the volunteer part of the woods. It is easier to get rid of them by removing and chipping the branches down low while they are still standing, then kill them with 20% Round-Up in holes drilled around the trunk. This kills the roots and prevents shoots from repopulating the area even worse.
They have gotten so thick it is difficult to limb them with the pole saw. So I am looking for an alternative. I was thinking of a battery chainsaw. My battery tools are DeWalt 20Vmax which I am happy with. I have a collection of batteries so I am pretty much locked into DeWalt. I went to look at the chain saws and they seem bulky for the spots I need to get into. Then I nrealized a reciprocating saw is less bulky and more easily handled wth one hand. They as close to the same price to that is not an issue
I am curious your thoughts on the chainsaw vs the reciprocating saw. I imagine the chain saw may be faster actually cutting. While the reciprocating saw would be easier to handle in tight spots among the tangle of branches. Most of the cuts would be less than 2" diameter. I can also see using either of these while chipping to remove side branches that will nt fit into the chipper.
What have I not considered?
I have a good Husqvarna chainsaw and also a Husqvarna pole saw. In addition I have a 3-point mounted wood chipper. I use pole saw to trim branches up to 16+ feet off the ground to make good logging timber for someone in the furure.
My problem is I have a bunch of invasive pear trees that are invading the younger woods. The older woods is fighting them off very well. They have gotten out of hand in the volunteer part of the woods. It is easier to get rid of them by removing and chipping the branches down low while they are still standing, then kill them with 20% Round-Up in holes drilled around the trunk. This kills the roots and prevents shoots from repopulating the area even worse.
They have gotten so thick it is difficult to limb them with the pole saw. So I am looking for an alternative. I was thinking of a battery chainsaw. My battery tools are DeWalt 20Vmax which I am happy with. I have a collection of batteries so I am pretty much locked into DeWalt. I went to look at the chain saws and they seem bulky for the spots I need to get into. Then I nrealized a reciprocating saw is less bulky and more easily handled wth one hand. They as close to the same price to that is not an issue
I am curious your thoughts on the chainsaw vs the reciprocating saw. I imagine the chain saw may be faster actually cutting. While the reciprocating saw would be easier to handle in tight spots among the tangle of branches. Most of the cuts would be less than 2" diameter. I can also see using either of these while chipping to remove side branches that will nt fit into the chipper.
What have I not considered?