Crank journal size math

Doug 13

Member
So I understand that the std crank Journal size is 2.488. For easy math I used 3 decimal places to get a rough idea. My crank shells have a #'676 010. My crank measurements are 2.242 front, 2.242 middle, and 2.244 rear. I did the math but not sure if the numbers are correct for a .010 under crank. Thanks
 
(quoted from post at 11:03:09 10/06/22) So I understand that the std crank Journal size is 2.488. For easy math I used 3 decimal places to get a rough idea. My crank shells have a #'676 010. My crank measurements are 2.242 front, 2.242 middle, and 2.244 rear. I did the math but not sure if the numbers are correct for a .010 under crank. Thanks

2.488'' - 2.243'' (average of your measurements) = 0.245'' (just short of 1/4'') something wrong in the numbers somewhere!
 

I looked up the main journal size, should be 2.2485'', so 2.2485'' - 2.243'' = 0.0055.

IF I did the math correctly your journals are five and a half thousandths undersized.

Did did you measure at several different points in case the journals ore wore ''out of round''?
 
What instrument did you use to measure the Journals.?...Micrometer I hope...

Was the Instrument ZEROED....as in checked with precision standard gauge......or did you use a Micrometer that is
set for
ie.......2.000 > 3.000 and did not check to verify that Micrometer was Zeroed.?

Bob..
cvphoto137457.jpg


cvphoto137458.png
 
(quoted from post at 14:53:35 10/06/22)
I looked up the main journal size, should be 2.2485'', so 2.2485'' - 2.243'' = 0.0055.

IF I did the math correctly your journals are five and a half thousandths undersized.

Did did you measure at several different points in case the journals ore wore ''out of round''?

The main journal size I have is 2.248-2.249 so 2.2485 is the midpoint of the tolerances. Your arithmetic is right. The crank is .005 under and needs to he ground .010 under for .010 under shells.

TOH
 
(quoted from post at 14:15:20 10/06/22) What instrument did you use to measure the Journals.?...Micrometer I hope...

Was the Instrument ZEROED....as in checked with precision standard gauge......or did you use a Micrometer that is
set for
ie.......2.000 > 3.000 and did not check to verify that Micrometer was Zeroed.?

Bob..
<img src=https://www.yesterdaystractors.com/cvphotos/cvphoto137457.jpg>

<img src=https://www.yesterdaystractors.com/cvphotos/cvphoto137458.png>

Yes, my numbers are truly off. I used a old borrowed micrometer. After talking with the owner he confessed to dropping them several times. So I will buy my own.
 
Yesterday's Tractor Forums

We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today.

Back
Top