I have read the Farmall 350 came standard with 2.50 inch diameter rear axles. Optional were 2.75 inch rear axles.
I measured the rear axles on my Farmall 350 and they are 2.75 inch diameter.
Question - what was the reason and or application that made a farmer order one of these tractors with the larger diameter axles? Internal to the rear end, was it constructed differently than 350s with 2.50 inch diameter rear axles, ie heavier gearing, bearings, etc. How would the larger axle and rear end compare to a M or 400 or 450 Farmall in terms of strength and capability?
I assume the larger axle is a good option for the Farmall 350? Is this a desirable option?
Any sage info is much appreciated.
Thanks!
Bill
I measured the rear axles on my Farmall 350 and they are 2.75 inch diameter.
Question - what was the reason and or application that made a farmer order one of these tractors with the larger diameter axles? Internal to the rear end, was it constructed differently than 350s with 2.50 inch diameter rear axles, ie heavier gearing, bearings, etc. How would the larger axle and rear end compare to a M or 400 or 450 Farmall in terms of strength and capability?
I assume the larger axle is a good option for the Farmall 350? Is this a desirable option?
Any sage info is much appreciated.
Thanks!
Bill
![cvphoto115784.jpg](https://www.yesterdaystractors.com/cvphotos/cvphoto115784.jpg)
![cvphoto115785.jpg](https://www.yesterdaystractors.com/cvphotos/cvphoto115785.jpg)
![cvphoto115786.jpg](https://www.yesterdaystractors.com/cvphotos/cvphoto115786.jpg)