I bought a PJ 7712 a few years ago and have no complaints. Seems to be a well built trailer.What is the empty weight on that trailer?
I bought a PJ 7712 a few years ago and have no complaints. Seems to be a well built trailer.What is the empty weight on that trailer?
How is the powder coat holding up? Do you store the trailer indoors?I bought a PJ 7712 a few years ago and have no complaints. Seems to be a well built trailer.

Stored indoors and it is fine now. I think I may have a few chips.How is the powder coat holding up? Do you store the trailer indoors?
Have to disagree with that one- 16" tires are still readily available. I have an '01 7.3 so it is the old bolt pattern, but is a duallie so still needs it's own spare, but the tires can swap. My dump trailer has 235/85/16s, and I just picked up a 3-axle equipment trailer in good shape, but it had 16.5's. Looked around and scrounged a bit, found one guy with 2 white spoke trailer wheels in 16 x 6.5, then found another guy with a set of 4, and they all match. Just put the 6 235/85/16's on that trailer yesterday, and I have a couple extra wheels that don't match visually but fine for spares. I also have a sweet old ex-uhaul utility trailer that has the 5-lug GM pickup pattern, and had a set of GM pickup aluminum wheels in 16", so that one has 245/75/16s on it. 3042 lbs per tire load rating is enough for meGood luck with that. Pickup trucks haven't run 16" wheels with an 8 on 6.5 pattern in 25 years. I'd rather run a higher capacity tire and carry a good dedicated spare.
Ford went to the metric bolt pattern when they introduced the super duty in 99Have to disagree with that one- 16" tires are still readily available. I have an '01 7.3 so it is the old bolt pattern, but is a duallie so still needs it's own spare, but the tires can swap. My dump trailer has 235/85/16s, and I just picked up a 3-axle equipment trailer in good shape, but it had 16.5's. Looked around and scrounged a bit, found one guy with 2 white spoke trailer wheels in 16 x 6.5, then found another guy with a set of 4, and they all match. Just put the 6 235/85/16's on that trailer yesterday, and I have a couple extra wheels that don't match visually but fine for spares. I also have a sweet old ex-uhaul utility trailer that has the 5-lug GM pickup pattern, and had a set of GM pickup aluminum wheels in 16", so that one has 245/75/16s on it. 3042 lbs per tire load rating is enough for me
Get after those chips with rust converter right away. The right stuff will chase the rust right under the powder coat and kill it.Stored indoors and it is fine now. I think I may have a few chips.

Have to disagree with that one- 16" tires are still readily available. I have an '01 7.3 so it is the old bolt pattern, but is a duallie so still needs it's own spare, but the tires can swap. My dump trailer has 235/85/16s, and I just picked up a 3-axle equipment trailer in good shape, but it had 16.5's. Looked around and scrounged a bit, found one guy with 2 white spoke trailer wheels in 16 x 6.5, then found another guy with a set of 4, and they all match. Just put the 6 235/85/16's on that trailer yesterday, and I have a couple extra wheels that don't match visually but fine for spares. I also have a sweet old ex-uhaul utility trailer that has the 5-lug GM pickup pattern, and had a set of GM pickup aluminum wheels in 16", so that one has 245/75/16s on it. 3042 lbs per tire load rating is enough for me
On our light fleet vehicles, we estimated three sets of front brake pads to one set of rear shoes.So what if he never had disc brakes that came on tractors 70 years ago? They are a far cry from modern disc brakes, and a completely different design.
The biggest problem people have with disc brakes is trying to re-use old rusty components to save money. I know all about it because I'm guilty of it myself. Your only mode of transportation is all torn apart in the driveway, so you use what you have, and in 6 months, you're doing it again.
You know why those drum brakes on the back of your old pickup truck lasted so long? THEY WEREN'T DOING ANYTHING! All the braking was done by the DISC brakes on the front! That's why they were always worn out and giving you trouble...
You appear to be under a common misconception. It is not the DOT that you need to worry about. The situation that can have a major effect on you life is if even through no fault of your own, you are involved in a serious wreck that involves a major loss to someone. Should you be found to not be in compliance, since the DOT seldom bothers guys like you, it would be the judge that you need to worry about.I have been using the new trailer for a couple of months now, the brakes work great, it tows straight and doesn't hop going down the road. There are two things that concern me, the empty weight is 7700# about 1200# more than was estimated and the tongue weight empty is 1900# about 500# more than I expected. The factory did not have an explanation on why the trailer is so heavy. The heavy tongue weight is because the axles are too far to the rear, no response from the factory on that concern either. With the axles so far to the rear it makes it a challenge to enter and exit driveways. If I am not careful how I load the trailer the tongue weight can quickly exceed 3000#.
These things are manageable, fortunately my payload weighs about 10,000#, so I am under the trailer GVW, especially when you factor in how much weight the truck is carrying. I am considering moving the front axle forward and making a spread axle trailer, have not decided if I want to do that or not.
For reference, the truck is rated by RAM to tow 20,000# but is limited to 2000# gooseneck tongue weight and RAM literature says tongue weight should be 10-15% of trailer loaded weight. Moritz says tongue weight should be 20-25% of trailer loaded weight. The trailer has two 8000# torsion axles, the GVW on the trailer is 17,900#. In our area they seldom bother guys like me as long as everything looks correct, so I am not overly concerned about the DOT.
Been there done that, cop and judge never asked a single questionYou appear to be under a common misconception. It is not the DOT that you need to worry about. The situation that can have a major effect on you life is if even through no fault of your own, you are involved in a serious wreck that involves a major loss to someone. Should you be found to not be in compliance, since the DOT seldom bothers guys like you, it would be the judge that you need to worry about.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today.
Copyright © 1997-2025 Yesterday's Tractor Co.
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters
Website Accessibility Policy