allis pullers Ive been thinking again

[Anonymous-0]

Outside the box ofcoarse.

 

[Anonymous-0]

That would be neat to put that Big block head on one! It would breath real good!

 

[Anonymous-0]

Seems like I did this a few years back. I think the BB chrysler was physically larger, but was closer to being able to drill new holes in..mighta been the SB though. If you are going to run SBC stuff, the old 468 castings were pretty good. 906 casting BB Mopar off the 68-69 440 superbees were a sood head too, so was the 915. SB Chrysler Magnum heads were the best bang for the buck and easy to obtain because every 93-00? 318 and 360 had them. I just dont remember which one was closest. I even looked at a olds rocket 350, but they are not a good selection.

 

[cde puller]

That would open up all kinds of options down here in the south it would blow some minds. keep us updated I'm going out to shop to brain storm this.

 

[Anonymous-0]

I am going to look at some other manufacturers as well i just have alot of chevy stuff laying around when i find what i want . It may be the bbc the plugs and combustion chamber is spaced correcyly . I will get a aluminum head so i can weld up bolt holes steam holes and cut easily.

 

[Anonymous-0]

(quoted from post at 08:21:23 04/02/11) I am going to look at some other manufacturers as well i just have alot of chevy stuff laying around when i find what i want . It may be the bbc the plugs and combustion chamber is spaced correcyly . I will get a aluminum head so i can weld up bolt holes steam holes and cut easily.

I have to be careful with the automotive heads . alot of automotive heads dont start flowing till .400 valve lift. I like low lift numbers on pullers.

 

[Anonymous-0]

you are a retard.

 

[Anonymous-0]

i would recommend trying a 351 cleveland head, not quite as large overall size as bbc, but same valves and flows almost as much air.

 

[Anonymous-0]

351 cleveland 4 v head 246cfm @.500 049 bbc head 250 cfm @.500 plus the cleveland head is to short in length.

 

[Anonymous-0]

(quoted from post at 11:14:54 04/03/11) 351 cleveland 4 v head 246cfm @.500 049 bbc head 250 cfm @.500 plus the cleveland head is to short in length.

thanks for the tip . the 440 head measures out better getting one tommorrow to look more closely at.

 

[wi50]

if you're worried about the ford head, think about the one on top of the chevy head in the picture. There is more potential in that piece of iron than most. My old Leroi head is closer to 300 cfm than it is to 200 at max valve lift.

 

[Anonymous-0]

(quoted from post at 00:19:58 04/08/11)
if you're worried about the ford head, think about the one on top of the chevy head in the picture. There is more potential in that piece of iron than most. My old Leroi head is closer to 300 cfm than it is to 200 at max valve lift.

Internet stalker posting on all my post I cant wait to see a picture of the leroi head flowing 300 cfm at 600 lift . the csa has to be large above three inches to do those numbers . Do not give any BS about wave tunning . Harmonic signals dont get strong enough to help untill the rpm is above 6500 .

 

[wi50]

reading comprehension is a wonderfull skill to have. Closer to 300 than to 200 simply means that it is over 250, as most of the world would understand.

Take a look in my pictures of the old manifold, you can get a pretty good idea of what the runner size is, as I or anyone else would match it fairley close to the intake runner of the head. I found a lot of potential as I've been working on it now and then. I did not change the runner size at all, but I did shape things better. Rember shape is more important than size. One also needs adequate cross sectional area to do the job and one needs to watch where local velocities are and what happens when doing the work. It's a pretty well balanced piece of proper sizeing and good shape. Now and then I make a little trip when I get something interesting or stumped on a problem I go see a fella who is a wiz at developing cylinder heads, he tested it a few times allong the way also and just similes and sends me home with more information, ideas and pieces to study, he's alwayse learning and I'm verry lucky that he will share just a small part of it.

So, maybe I will or will not post some pictures, what I learn is mine to keep.

 

[Anonymous-0]

(quoted from post at 05:39:33 04/08/11)
reading comprehension is a wonderfull skill to have. Closer to 300 than to 200 simply means that it is over 250, as most of the world would understand.

Take a look in my pictures of the old manifold, you can get a pretty good idea of what the runner size is, as I or anyone else would match it fairley close to the intake runner of the head. I found a lot of potential as I've been working on it now and then. I did not change the runner size at all, but I did shape things better. Rember shape is more important than size. One also needs adequate cross sectional area to do the job and one needs to watch where local velocities are and what happens when doing the work. It's a pretty well balanced piece of proper sizeing and good shape. Now and then I make a little trip when I get something interesting or stumped on a problem I go see a fella who is a wiz at developing cylinder heads, he tested it a few times allong the way also and just similes and sends me home with more information, ideas and pieces to study, he's alwayse learning and I'm verry lucky that he will share just a small part of it.

So, maybe I will or will not post some pictures, what I learn is mine to keep.

CSA OF A 2INCH ROUND TUBE IS 3.14csa .

 

[Anonymous-0]

(quoted from post at 06:32:26 04/08/11)

(quoted from post at 05:39:33 04/08/11)
reading comprehension is a wonderfull skill to have. Closer to 300 than to 200 simply means that it is over 250, as most of the world would understand.

Take a look in my pictures of the old manifold, you can get a pretty good idea of what the runner size is, as I or anyone else would match it fairley close to the intake runner of the head. I found a lot of potential as I've been working on it now and then. I did not change the runner size at all, but I did shape things better. Rember shape is more important than size. One also needs adequate cross sectional area to do the job and one needs to watch where local velocities are and what happens when doing the work. It's a pretty well balanced piece of proper sizeing and good shape. Now and then I make a little trip when I get something interesting or stumped on a problem I go see a fella who is a wiz at developing cylinder heads, he tested it a few times allong the way also and just similes and sends me home with more information, ideas and pieces to study, he's alwayse learning and I'm verry lucky that he will share just a small part of it.

So, maybe I will or will not post some pictures, what I learn is mine to keep.

CSA OF A 2INCH ROUND TUBE IS 3.14csa .

quote="wi50"](quoted from post at 05:39:33 04/08/11)
reading comprehension is a wonderfull skill to have. Closer to 300 than to 200 simply means that it is over 250, as most of the world would understand. my reply to that is most of the world now understands that cylinder head flow when WI50 tells it is like fishing stories it grows larger each time you tell it.

 

[wi50]

(reply to post at 21:57:49 04/08/11)

you'll figure it out sometime.

 

[Anonymous-0]

(quoted from post at 12:37:34 04/09/11)

(reply to post at 21:57:49 04/08/11)

ts figured out . a lot of BS never a straight answer always left open for interpretation.